Legal Opinion

Associates of the Jersey Co. v. Davison

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1860PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In error to the Hudson Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Whelpley, J.

The principal reasons relied upon for the reversal of this judgment are—

1. That the bill of particulars annexed to the lien claim is radically erroneous, in not specifying or exhibiting the amount and kind of labor performed, of materials furnished, and the prices at which and the times when the same were performed and furnished.

2. That there was no consent in writing by the owner of the land within the 4th section of the act regulating liens.

3. That the buildings having been erected under contract not filed in the clerk’s office, upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Attorney General v. Utica InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  2. Crocker v. CraneNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  3. Stodder v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1828

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mills v. East Windsor TownshipNew Jersey Tax Court · 1980
  2. Baker v. DeaneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  3. Riccio v. New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  4. Hughes v. DursoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  5. Dvorkin v. Township of DoverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API