Legal Opinion
Dvorkin v. Township of Dover
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 10, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
29 N.J. 303 (1959)
148 A.2d 793
HENRY DVORKIN AND ESTHER DVORKIN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF DOVER, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued February 3, 1959.
Decided March 10, 1959.
Mr. Algernon T. Sweeney argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants (Mr. Victor Samuel, attorney).
Mr. Roy G. Simmons argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Messrs. Camp and Simmons, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by BURLING, J.
This is an action for a refund of moneys paid by plaintiffs Henry Dvorkin and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Alexander v. New Jersey Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Brandon v. Board of Commissioners of MontclairSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
- United States v. Purcell Envelope Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Brandon v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
- Wright v. VogtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brewer v. PorchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- In Re Expungement of Commitment Records of D. G.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977