Legal Opinion

United States v. Oliver

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 16, 2009No. 08-30305Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Nathan Edgar Oliver, III appeals a summary judgment granted against him arising out of an in rem action by the United States to foreclose on property he owned. His sole defense to the action was that the mortgages were unenforceable because the statute of limitations had run on the underlying notes. For the reasons set forth below, we agree with the district court and AFFIRM.

I

This case was brought by the United States of America, acting through the Farmers Home Administration (“FmHA”), now known as the Farm Service Agency. The FmHA seeks to obtain an in rem judgment on the basis…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. XL Specialty Insurance v. Kiewit Offshore Services, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  3. Westnau Land Corp. v. U.S. Small Business Administration, as an Agency of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Hilario R. Alvarado, Madel SocorroCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. John Ward and Lowann J. WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API