Equity General Insurance v. C & a Realty Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1DissentKleinschmidt, Judge
I respectfully dissent. I do agree that the reservation of rights letter that Equity General sent to C & A was not sugar-coated and would have been adequate had it also been sent to counsel for C & A. I believe, however, that material facts remain in dispute on the issue of whether Equity General acted in bad faith and that C & A should be entitled to litigate that issue.
A detailed reference to the underlying facts is appropriate: After C & A was sued by Pruitt, Equity General retained the law firm of Udall, Shumway, Blackhurst, Allen, Lyons & Davis to defend C & A. This law firm had…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brown v. Guarantee InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. LittleArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Parsons v. Continental National American GroupArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Isaak v. Massachusetts Indemnity Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.