Legal Opinion · Dissent

Equity General Insurance v. C & a Realty Co.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 12, 1985No. 1 CA-CIV 6973Published

1DissentKleinschmidt, Judge

I respectfully dissent. I do agree that the reservation of rights letter that Equity General sent to C & A was not sugar-coated and would have been adequate had it also been sent to counsel for C & A. I believe, however, that material facts remain in dispute on the issue of whether Equity General acted in bad faith and that C & A should be entitled to litigate that issue.

A detailed reference to the underlying facts is appropriate: After C & A was sued by Pruitt, Equity General retained the law firm of Udall, Shumway, Blackhurst, Allen, Lyons & Davis to defend C & A. This law firm had…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brown v. Guarantee InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  3. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. LittleArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Parsons v. Continental National American GroupArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Isaak v. Massachusetts Indemnity Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API