Legal Opinion
Heineken Technical Services, B v. v. Darby
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 26, 2000No. 1:98-cv-11952PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TAURO, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Heineken Technical Services B.V. is a Dutch corporation engaged in the business of designing and licensing technologies relating to the bottling and container industry. Defendant Charles Darby is a Massachusetts citizen and the principal owner of Defendant DecoTec International, Ltd., a Massachusetts corporation. Defendant Wolfgang Fiwek is a German Citizen.
According to Plaintiffs Complaint, Brandt Technologies, Inc. (“Brandt”) invented a process and a device for applying labels to bottles or packages. Brandt assigned all rights to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Taylor v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Allendale Mutual Insurance Company v. Bull Data Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Timely Products Corporation, Raphael J. Costanzo v. Stanley ArronCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- HIF Bio, Inc. v. Yung Shin Pharmaceuticals Industrial Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Display Research Laboratories, Inc. v. Telegen Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2001
- Sagoma Plastics, Inc. v. GelardiDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2005
- Bayer AG v. Sony Electronics, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2002
- Post Performance, LLC v. Renaissance Imports, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.