Legal Opinion
Altman v. Bobcat Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 22, 2009No. 08-3161Published
1Opinion of the Court
*760OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Bobcat Company1 appeals from a judgment entered by the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on a jury verdict finding Bobcat fully liable for injuries sustained by Thomas Altman in an accident involving a Bobcat Model 709 backhoe attachment. Following a seven-day trial, the jury found Bobcat’s negligence to be the sole cause of Altman’s injuries and awarded $2,991,337.00 in damages to Plaintiffs Thomas and Roxana Altman. The District Court denied Bobcat’s motion for a new trial, and this appeal followed.
Bobcat urges this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hinkle v. City of ClarksburgCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- McKenna v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- William P. Becker v. Arco Chemical Company, in No. 98-1636 William P. Becker v. Arco Chemical Company, William P. Becker, in No. 98-1888Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Carol Gagne FUSCO, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.