Legal Opinion
Hentze v. CSX TRANSPORTATION INC.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 7, 2020No. 1:17-cv-00217Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION MERLE F. HENTZE, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:17-cv-217 v. JUDGE DOUGLAS R. COLE CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Merle Hentze (“Hentze”) claims that Defendant CSX Transportation (“CSXT”) violated the Americans with Disabilities Act, as amended (“ADA/ADAAA”), and corresponding Ohio law, see Ohio Revised Code § 4112.02, when it terminated him after he failed a written examination required for promotion from his current position of trainman to his new position of locomotive engineer. More…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.