Harris v. Davenport.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Action by I. A. Harris, administrator, against D. D. Davenport and others, beard by Judge M. E. Justice and a jury, at March Term, 1902, of the Superior Court of Buncombe County. From a judgment for the plaintiff, the defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
There are two questions involved in this appeal; one is, whether or not the claim of the plaintiff as a creditor of his intestate is barred by the Statute of Limitations, and the other is whether the doctrine of lis pen-dens is applicable to the purchaser of the land at a sale made by order of the Superior Court of Transylvania County. The defendants, except Charles A. Moore, axe non-residents of this State, and the defendants, M. A. Davenport, T. M. West, Emily C. Thompson, O. P. Reese, Jane Miles, B. F. West and Mary Bearden, are the heirs at law of the plaintiff’s intestate. At the time of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Arrington v. . ArringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Collingwood v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Straus, Hartman, Hofflin & Co. v. BeardsleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- Dalton v. . WebsterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
- Woodlief v. . BraggSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gaines v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Jones v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Bradshaw v. Citizens National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Sachs v. Ohio Nat. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Clause v. Columbia Savings & Loan Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1908
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.