Woodlief v. . Bragg
Supreme Court of North Carolina
This was a civil action, tried before Boykin, J., at January Term, 1891, of Gkanville Superior Court. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Clakk, J.:
The creditor presented the claims now in dispute to the administrator within one year of his qualification, and said claims were not barred by the statute of limitations at the death of the intestate. The administrator files this petition to condemn proceeds of sale of certain real estate in the Clerk’s office as assets to pay debts, there being an insufficiency of assets, and the defendants, the heirs at law, seek the benefit of the statute of limitations.
The Code, § 164, provides that if a claim is “ filed with the personal representative within the time above specified (i. e. one…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Speer v. . JamesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Bevers v. . ParkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Flemming v. . FlemmingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Hall v. . GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harris v. Davenport.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Lee v. . McKoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Justice v. Gallert.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Rodman v. . StillmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Hinton v. . PritchardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.