Legal Opinion

Chamberlain v. Ruby Drilling Co., Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1999No. 98-355PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying Appellant’s motion to set aside a default judgment on the basis that the State of Wyoming did not have personal jurisdiction over him. We determine that the Appellant had sufficient minimum contacts with the State of Wyoming to invoke personal jurisdiction and conclude, therefore, that the district court did not abuse its discretion.

ISSUE

Appellant Steve Chamberlain, individually and d/b/a M & J Oil Company (Appellant), frames the issue for consideration as:

Is the default judgment entered…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. State Ex Rel. White Lumber Sales, Inc. v. SulmonettiOregon Supreme Court · 1968

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kathryn Ann Heimer v. Mason William HeimerWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. First National Bank of Steamboat Springs, N.A.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Josiah Moran, Conservator of Sm, a Minor Child v. Meadowlark Academy Inc. and Preston ThurinWyoming Supreme Court · 2026
  4. Vanderzanden Farms, LLC v. Dow Agrosciences, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API