Surlak v. Fulfree
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The instant appeal presents for our consideration the issue *80of whether a provision in the parties’ separation agreement which grants the defendant wife a right of exclusive use and occupancy of the marital premises, and which imposes no express conditions or limitations upon that right, should nevertheless be deemed limited by law to a reasonable duration. For the reasons which follow, we conclude that it should.
The record reveals that the parties married in 1959 and entered into a separation agreement in 1973. In addition to requiring the plaintiff husband to pay the…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Surlak v. SurlakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Albin v. AlbinNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- McNally v. McNallyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Luvera v. LuveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Albin v. AlbinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Thurmond v. ThurmondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Freigang v. FreigangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Sherman v. ShermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Pando v. TapiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Leonardo v. LeonardoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.