Legal Opinion
Ackerman v. Steisel
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 14, 1985PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (104 AD2d 940; see also, White v Adler, 289 NY 34, 44).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander. Taking no part: Judge Titone.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ackerman v. SteiselAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- White v. AdlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 100 Of New York, N.Y. & Vicinity, Afl-Cio v. City Of New York Department Of Parks & RecreationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Van Cortlandt Park v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Capruso v. Village of Kings PointNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- Ellington Construction Corp. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Douglaston & Little Neck Coalition v. SextonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.