Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Camacho
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOLLIS HORTON, Justice.
We resolve two principal questions in this appeal. First, we determine if the evidence in this workers’ compensation case is legally sufficient to support the jury’s finding that Mario Camacho suffered a skull injury. Second, we decide whether the trial court improperly instructed the jury to give the decision of the Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission no special weight. We answer both questions in the affirmative and reverse and remand the case for a new trial.
TRIAL TESTIMONY AND VERDICT
Camacho was a rancher with more than twenty years’ experience at the time…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Helena Chemical Co. v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. CAT Contracting, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hamid v. LexusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011
- In Re Commitment of Miller, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2008
- FPL Farming Ltd. v. Environmental Processing Systems, L.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Francisco Chamul v. Amerisure Mutual Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Alma R. Briones v. Hitzelt Sharkey, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.