Legal Opinion

William Alan Callison v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 9, 1969No. 23014_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Circuit Judge:

Following a non jury trial appellant was found guilty of refusal to submit to induction into the Armed Forces of the United States in violation of 50 App.U. S.C. § 462(a). He has taken this appeal from judgment.

1. Refusal to Submit

The principal question presented is whether appellant can, under the peculiar facts of this case, be charged with refusal to submit to induction. His “refusal” consisted of his disobedience of an order of the officer in charge of induction, as a consequence of which he was, prior to being processed, arrested and removed from the induction…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Adderley v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. United States v. Joel Simon MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. Danny C. Christopher, Jack Herer, John B. Michel, John Gefall, and Kenneth R. KlotzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Sellers v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. Dash v. Commanding General, Fort Jackson, South CarolinaDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1969
  4. United States v. William Alan CallisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  5. Fitzgerald v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API