Legal Opinion
In re Cole
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided February 7, 2006No. COA05-7PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HUNTER, Judge.
Hercules Cole and Celestine Cole ("plaintiffs") appeal from an order entered 14 April 2004 denying plaintiffs' counsel's Motion for Admission to Practice Pro Hac Vice and granting defendants' motion for sanctions and attorneys' fees. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Plaintiffs hired Waverly W. Jones ("Jones") in October 2003 to represent them in an action related to the foreclosure on their house located in Elizabeth City. Jones was licensed to practice in the state of Virginia, but did not have a North Carolina law license.
Jones first…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Viar v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
- Steingress v. SteingressSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Hatcher v. Harrah's NC Casino Company, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Staley v. LingerfeltCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Danielson v. CummingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carolina Home Sols. 1, Inc. v. Crystal Coast Home Sols., Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2018