Legal Opinion
Helms v. Chester Redevelopment Authority
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 15, 1977No. Appeal, No. 1796 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Rogers,
The appellant, Paul E. Helms, filed a petition for the appointment of viewers pursuant to Section 502(e) of the Eminent Domain Code, Act of June 22, 1964, Special Sess., P.L. 84, as amended, 26 P.S. §1-502(e), alleging a de facto taking of his property at 1336-40 West Ninth Street, Chester, Pennsylvania, by the Chester Redevelopment Authority (Authority). The Authority filed preliminary objections asserting that the appellant’s petition failed to set forth any facts establishing a compensable injury or a condemnation. The Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, after a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Conroy-Prugh Glass Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth's Crosstown Expressway AppealCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Hazleton Redevelopment Authority v. HudockCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- In re Cornell Industrial Electric Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- County of Allegheny v. Church of Jesus ChristCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McCracken v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. LawtonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- In re Condemnation of Premises 320 Crestview CircleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- In Re Condemnation by County of AlleghenyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- West Penn Power Co. v. BRUNICommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.