Reynolds v. Lentz
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
This action was brought by the plaintiffs-appellants for the purpose of establishing and enforcing as against the defendants-appellees the rights of the plaintiffs to the performance of a contract for the sale of real property between the plaintiffs as vendees and the defendants Lentz as vendors. The court below found that the plaintiffs were in default under the contract; that the vendors had properly terminated it because of such default; that plaintiffs had lost all rights under the contract; and that the defendants were entitled to possession of the property and to recover from the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- McDowell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Ex parte WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Robert RoyalsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Two Guys From Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. Paul A. McGinley District Attorney, County of Lehigh, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Anthony (Tony) Fernandez v. Raymond W. Meier, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Dean v. FirorAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Paul Mitchell v. C. L. SnipesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.