Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Neys

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Moody county. Hon. Joseph W. Moore, Judge. Action to cancel a bond for a deed, by John C. Taylor against Peter Neys’ impleaded with another. Prom a judgment for Peter Neys, plaintiff appeals. The i’ecord of a judgment cannot be impugned. When the record made up by a court of general jurisdiction shows conclusively that a certain question has been judicially determined between the same parties, evidence aliunde is inadmissible to contradict it.

Read the full summary

Appeal from circuit court, Moody county. Hon. Joseph W. Moore, Judge. Action to cancel a bond for a deed, by John C. Taylor against Peter Neys’ impleaded with another. Prom a judgment for Peter Neys, plaintiff appeals. The i’ecord of a judgment cannot be impugned. When the record made up by a court of general jurisdiction shows conclusively that a certain question has been judicially determined between the same parties, evidence aliunde is inadmissible to contradict it. Russell v. Place, 94 U. S. 608; Freeman on Judgments, §§ 275, 272; McLain v. Hungarian, 13 Johns 184; King v. Fuller, 3…

1Opinion of the CourtPuller, J.

Answering the complaint in this action to cancel a bond for a deed and by way of counterclaim, the defendant charged plaintiff with a breach of the terms of such instrument, and alleged full performance on his part, but consented to a cancellation thereof upon the restoration of $1,100, which he had already paid, as a part purchase price of the premises therein described. In reply to the counterclaim, a former suit between the same parties was pleaded in bar, and, on this appeal from a judgment for the full amount claimed by defendant, plaintiff insists that the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hickerson v. City of MexicoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  2. Munro v. MeechMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Delany v. ReadeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
  4. Harrison v. WoodThe Superior Court of New York City · 1853
  5. Marcellus v. CountrymanNew York Supreme Court · 1873

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Godfrey v. FaustSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Fowler v. Iowa Land Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Van Wagenen v. ChladekSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API