State v. Gonzalez-Rivera
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
*786 Opinion
LAVERY, J.
The defendant, Marcus Gonzalez-Rivera, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a trial by a three judge court,1 of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a.2 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) applied the standard for extreme emotional disturbance and therefore deprived the defendant of his constitutional right to establish a defense, (2) concluded that the defendant failed to establish his defense of extreme emotional disturbance, (3) concluded that the state presented sufficient evidence to support his conviction,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Anderson v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. BereisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Fahey v. Safeco Insurance of AmericaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. VieraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- State v. MooreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.