Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Loftin v. Cobb

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 27, 1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Civil AgttoN against J. W. Cobb, and Ms official bond, as formen guardian of plaintiff’s wards, tried before Star-bucle, J., at Fall Term, 1899, of PasquotaNK Superior Court.

Read the full summary

Civil AgttoN against J. W. Cobb, and Ms official bond, as formen guardian of plaintiff’s wards, tried before Star-bucle, J., at Fall Term, 1899, of PasquotaNK Superior Court. J. W. Cobb had been appointed guardian in July, 1897, and was removed in February, 1899. He had had several predecessors, who died indebted to the wards, but leaving solvent estates; upon one of the estates, that of S. Weisel, Cobb had administered, and was also surviving partner of the firm of S. Weisel & Co., and, as such, had assigned all the partnership’ effects to himself as administrator. The plaintiff introduced…

1Opinion of the CourtFaircloth, C. J.

This is an action by the present guardian against the bond of the defendant Cobb, a former guardian of the same wards. It was admitted that S. Weisel qualified as guardian for the infant plaintiffs on April 9, 1883, and died on June 6, 1886 j that 0. Guirkin qualified as guardian for the said wards on June 23, 1886, and died March 21, 1895; that G. W. Cobb qualified as guardian for the said wards on July 31, 1897, and was removed by order of the court on the .... day of February, 1899, and thereafter, to-wit, on May 2, 1899, the plaintiff, Loftim, qualified as guardian of the said minors.

It…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Harris v. HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sheets v. J. G. Flynt Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. First National Bank v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  3. Campbell v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API