Legal Opinion

Branson v. Alliance Coal, LLC

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided July 10, 2025No. 4:19-cv-00155Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY OWENSBORO DIVISION RANDY BRANSON, et al. Plaintiffs v. Case No. 4:19-cv-155-RGJ-HBB ALLIANCE COAL, LLC, et al. Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Plaintiffs1 are coal miners who allege that Defendants2 required them to work pre- and post-shift without due compensation. [DE 340-1 at 4854]. The parties now jointly move for preliminary approval of a settlement for a proposed class. [DE 340]. For the following reasons, the parties’ joint motion [DE 340] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. A final approval hearing is scheduled for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. 12 Fair empl.prac.cas. 451, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,741 John Senter, Cross-Appellee v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API