S. F. Bowser & Co. v. Independent Dye House, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.
This is an action of contract wherein the plaintiff, a manufacturer of many years’ experience of systems or installations for the clarification of the solvent used in dry cleaning establishments, entered into a written contract with the defendant for the furnishing and installation by the plaintiff in the plant of the defendant of “1 Complete continuous white solvent circulating system for 8 washers, as shown on B Print E-6314.” It was “agreed” at the trial “that the contract may be regarded as amended or modified by mutual agreement by substituting ‘blueprint 6358’ for ‘blueprint 6314,’ and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lindenbaum v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Glackin v. BennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Bekkevold v. PottsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Sterling-Midland Coal Co. v. Great Lakes Coal & Coke Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929
- International Textbook Co. v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Street Trust Co. v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Royal Paper Box Co. v. Munro & Church Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Hunt v. PERKINS MACHINERY CO. INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Taylor v. JacobsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Dekofski v. LeiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.