Legal Opinion

S. F. Bowser & Co. v. Independent Dye House, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 30, 1931PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action of contract wherein the plaintiff, a manufacturer of many years’ experience of systems or installations for the clarification of the solvent used in dry cleaning establishments, entered into a written contract with the defendant for the furnishing and installation by the plaintiff in the plant of the defendant of “1 Complete continuous white solvent circulating system for 8 washers, as shown on B Print E-6314.” It was “agreed” at the trial “that the contract may be regarded as amended or modified by mutual agreement by substituting ‘blueprint 6358’ for ‘blueprint 6314,’ and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lindenbaum v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Glackin v. BennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Bekkevold v. PottsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Sterling-Midland Coal Co. v. Great Lakes Coal & Coke Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929
  5. International Textbook Co. v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Street Trust Co. v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. Royal Paper Box Co. v. Munro & Church Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Hunt v. PERKINS MACHINERY CO. INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  4. Taylor v. JacobsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  5. Dekofski v. LeiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API