Legal Opinion
Golden v. CH2M HILL HANFORD GROUP, INC.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 11, 2008No. 05-35832PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
We interpret the Price-Anderson Act.
Facts
Daniel Golden worked at a facility on the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, operated by the CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc. (CH2M). CH2M stored liquid waste in large storage tanks; the liquid contained radioactive materials and nonradioactive heavy metals. On May 20, 2002, Golden was working on one of these tanks when up to four gallons of this toxic liquid splashed on him.
Golden sued CH2M in state court under Washington law, claiming that the accident caused him physical injuries rang ing from colitis to sinusitis, as well as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Hanford Nuclear Reservation Litigation, Jeanne Jaros, on Their Own Behalf and as Representatives of Classes of Similarly Situated Persons v. E.I. Dupont, in Re Hanford Nuclear Reservation Litigation, E.S. Criswell, Arel Quessenberry, Luther Stacy, Jr., Raymond L. Swaim, Betty L. Swaim, James R. Swaim and John S. Swaim, on Their Own Behalf and as Representatives of Classes of Similarly Situated Persons v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and General Electric Company, in Re Hanford Nuclear Reservation Litigation, Chuck Seaman, as Personal Representative for Frieda Theresa Seaman, Deceased Mark Seaman, Jr. Chuck Seaman v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, a Delaware Corporation General Electric Company, a New York Corporation, in Re Hanford Nuclear Reservation Litigation, Andra L. Evenson v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, in Re Hanford Nuclear Reservation Litigation, Kathryn Hamilton, Diana Cottam, James and Janet Boyd and Connie Soper, on Their Own Behalf and as Representatives of Classes of Similarly Situated Persons v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company General Electric Co. Unc, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Company, Rockwell International Corporation, Westinghouse Electric Corporation and Westinghouse Hanford Company, in Re Hanford Nuclear Reservation Litigation, Rosemary Miller v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours General ElectricCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- In Re Berg Litigation, Louis Berg v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, a Delaware Corporation General Electric Co. Unc No. 99-35979 Nuclear Industries, Inc., Now Merged Into Unc Holdings, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Unc Holdings Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlantic Richfield Company Capital Accumulation Plan Ii, (Arco), a Delaware Corporation Rockwell International Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Good v. Fluor Daniel Corp.District Court, E.D. Washington · 2002
- Osarczuk v. Associated Universities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Phillips v. E.I. Dupont de Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
3Cited by26 opinions
- Myers v. Illinois Central RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- City of Los Angeles v. County of KernCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Cotroneo v. Shaw Environment & Infra-Structure, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Cook v. Rockwell International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- McClellan v. I-Flow Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.