Legal Opinion
Henneberry v. ING Capital Advisors
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 18, 2008PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ciparick, J.
In November 2001, petitioner Virginia Henneberry entered into an employment agreement with respondent ING Furman Selz Asset Management, LLC, the parent company of corespondent ING Capital Advisors, LLC. The agreement provided that petitioner was to be employed as a managing principal of ING Capital Advisors from January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2005.
Paragraph 11 of the agreement listed four circumstances that could lead to petitioner’s termination, two of which are relevant here. Under paragraph 11 (b), petitioner could be terminated by a unanimous vote of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- New York City Transit Authority v. Transport Workers' Union of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Goldfinger v. LiskerNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Massena Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- New York State Department of Labor v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- New York City v. Transport Workers Union of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Arbitration between Johnson & Trustee for the Casaburi FamilyNew York Supreme Court · 2008
- Peterec-Tolino v. Commercial Electrical Contractors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.