Legal Opinion
Peterec-Tolino v. Commercial Electrical Contractors, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 5, 2009PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtMercure, J.
Appeal from a decision of an arbitrator, filed February 27, 2007, which ruled that claimant did not suffer a compensable injury.
Claimant, who was employed as a fifth-year apprentice by respondent Commercial Electrical Contractors, Inc., was terminated from his employment on July 7, 2006, after allegedly threatening a project superintendent. He thereafter filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits based upon a neck and back injury sustained shortly prior to his termination. Pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 25 (2-c), the claim proceeded under the Alternate Dispute Resolution…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wien & Malkin LLP v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Wien & Malkin LLP v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Claim of Hernandez v. Vogel's Collision ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Claim of Mazayoff v. A.C.V.L. Companies, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Henneberry v. ING Capital AdvisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of Diaz v. Kleinknecht ElectricAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014