Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Nixon v. Hoester

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 1996No. 70576PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GERALD M. SMITH, Judge.

Relator sought our writ of prohibition or alternatively our writ of mandamus to preclude respondent from entering an amended judgment in the underlying case, State ex rel. Nixon v. Erickson, and from taking any further action based on such amended judgment including setting a supersedeas bond. The respondent had entered an amended judgment prior to the filing of the application for writ. We issued our preliminary writ which we now make permanent.

The underlying action was a civil proceeding in which the Attorney General of Missouri sought injunctive relief preventing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Glick v. GlickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  2. Reynolds v. Briarwood Development Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Wear v. WalkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Highland Gardens Nursery, Inc. v. North American Developers, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  5. McClellan v. Highland Sales & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hazelwood Yellow Ribbon Committee v. KlosMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Finley v. St. John's Mercy Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Brown v. Rollet Bros. Trucking Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Hackathorn v. Four Seasons Lakesites, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Investment Corp. of the Virginias v. AcquavivaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API