Legal Opinion

People v. Travis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Sconiers, J.). We add only that the contention of petitioner that the court erred in directing a new hearing rather than restoring him to parole supervision is without merit (see, People ex rel. Martinez u New York State Bd. of Parole, 56 NY2d 588; People ex rel. Mott v Kalamanka, 112 AD2d 720). (Appeals from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sconiers, J.—Habeas Corpus.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Martinez v. New York State Board of ParoleNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People ex rel. Mott v. KalamankaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985