People Ex Rel. Martinez v. New York State Board of Parole
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
Relator’s final parole revocation hearing was adjourned three times, at least two of the continuances being at relator’s request. On the 81st day, the hearing was held in the absence of relator who was attending a criminal trial. The hearing officer noted the proximity of the 90-day limit (see Executive Law, § 259-i, subd 3, par [f], cl [i]) and determined to “proceed in absentia, subject to the inmate’s rights of cross-examination at some later date, if he so desires.” Relator’s parole was…
2Cited by19 opinions
- People ex rel. Martinez v. WaltersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People ex rel. Bronson v. MeloniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People ex rel. Walker v. New York State Board of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People ex rel. Johnson v. New York State Board of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Peek v. DennisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.