Legal Opinion

Georgetown Cnty. v. Davis & Floyd, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 13, 2019No. Appellate Case No. 2017-000234; Opinion No. 5627PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, J.:

This appeal requires us to determine whether a county may sue another political subdivision and the South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT) for inverse condemnation. Because we hold the property Georgetown County (the County) alleges was inversely condemned is not "private property" within the meaning of the Takings Clause of S.C. Const. art I, § 13, and further hold the County may not sue SCDOT, a state agency, on such a claim, we affirm dismissal of the County's claim.

I

The County alleges the City of Georgetown (the City) and SCDOT, while engaged in a joint water…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Texas Department of Transportation v. City of Sunset ValleyTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. United States v. CarmackSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. SID No. 67 v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Burke v. SCDOTCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020
  3. Georgetown County v. Davis & FloydSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API