Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Besselaar

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 20, 1992No. 1901719PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The petitioner, Tracey H. Besselaar, filed a Rule 32, A.R.Cr.P. (formerly Temporary Rule 20), petition for relief. The circuit court denied the petition, holding that the issue presented could have been raised at trial and, additionally, that the issue could have been raised on direct appeal. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed. This Court granted Besselaar's petition for the writ of certiorari.

In his petition to this Court, Besselaar argues that he is entitled to relief because, he says, his trial counsel was ineffective; specifically, he bases this allegation on a claim that his attorney…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Brownlee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  2. Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  3. Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  4. Grayson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  5. Ex Parte GrauSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API