Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Grau

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 7, 2000No. 1981601PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Tucker Grau filed in the Baldwin Circuit Court a petition pursuant to Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., seeking postconviction relief based on a claim that at his criminal trial he had had ineffective assistance of counsel. The circuit court denied the petition. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the denial, without opinion. Grau v. State (No. CR-97-2274, April 30, 1999) 768 So.2d 1021 (Ala.Crim.App. 1999) (table). We granted Grau's petition for certiorari review. Because the circuit court did not make specific findings of fact in accordance with Rule 32.9, Ala.R.Crim.P., we reverse the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  2. Owens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  3. Ex Parte BesselaarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Ex parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Anglin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Adkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  2. Stallworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  3. Ex Parte McCallSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  4. Hodges v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  5. Tarver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API