Wilmer v. Board of County Commissioners of Leavenworth County
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VAN BEBBER, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion for release of supersedeas bond (Doc. 228). Plaintiff has responded (Doc. 233) and opposes the motion. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.
In the present motion, defendant seeks release of the supersedeas bond posted by defendant to secure the unpaid balance of the judgment, including accrued interest and costs, during its appeal. The court has received the decision in mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The Tenth Circuit held that this court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lienhard v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- James Harold Wilmer, Jr. v. Board of County Commissioners of Leavenworth CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Griffin v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Shapiro v. Kansas Public Employees Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- Berek v. Metropolitan Dade CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Benoit v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Maryland State Highway Administration v. KimCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. NL IndustriesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- James Harold Wilmer, Jr. v. Board of County Commissioners of Leavenworth County, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996