Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Browder

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1853Published

*This is a writ of error to the supreme court in Greene •county, allowed by the late supreme court in bank. The case is fully stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtThurman, J.

Taylor brought covenant against Browder in the *195common pleas of Greene county, on a penal bond, penalty $478, subject to a condition as follows: “ The condition of the above obligation is such, that if the above bound James Browder, his heirs, executors and administrators shall make, or cause to be made, a general warranty deed to the following described piece of- land [description], then and in that case this obligation to be void, else to remain in full force and virtue.”

The declaration averred a demand of the deed, and that a reasonable time for its execution and delivery had elapsed; but…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark v. RedmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1825
  2. Commonwealth v. ChandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  3. Bradley v. OsterhoudtNew York Supreme Court · 1816
  4. Sook v. KnowlesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1808
  5. Dougherty v. LewellenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1814

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API