Legal Opinion

Clark v. Redman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1825PublishedCited by 20 opinions

ERROR to the Washington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

This was an action of covenant on two bonds, executed by Clark, Hoggatt, and Kitchell, conditioned for making a lawful title to Redman for certain lots of ground, upon his payment of the purchase-money. The defendants pleaded, 1st, non-payment of the purchase-money; 2dly, cove-pants performed^ 3dly, tender of title. Issues were joined up *380on these pleas, and the jury gave a verdict for the plaintiff Motion for a new trial overruled, and judgment rendered upon the verdict. The defendants institute this writ of error.

To support his action, the plaintiff relied upon the bonds and payment of the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bethell v. BethellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Moffitt v. . ManessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  3. Dwight v. CutlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Burns v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  5. Hancock v. RitchieIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API