Legal Opinion

Tsuetaki v. Novicky

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 7, 1983No. 81—1727, 81—2857 consPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McGILLICUDDY

Following a bench trial, defendant, Nick N. Novicky (Novicky), was found to have breached his employment contract with plaintiffs, George F. Tsuetaki and Fused Kontacts of Chicago, Inc. (Tsuetaki). The trial court also found that modifications of the contract were void for duress, fraud and lack of consideration. An order was entered granting the injunctive relief sought by Tsuetaki, and ordering Nov-icky to return sums of money received pursuant to the contract modifications.

On appeal Novicky asserts (1) the injunction is overly broad, permanently precluding him from disseminating any and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Elfman v. Evanston Bus Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Esczuk v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Village of Wilsonville v. SCA Services, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Diacou v. Palos State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Schlicksup Drug Co., Inc. v. SchlicksupAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Roton Barrier, Inc. And Austin R. Baer v. The Stanley WorksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. John J. Rickhoff Sheet Metal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. Caparos v. MortonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  4. Abreu v. Unica Industrial Sales, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Hartman v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API