Legal Opinion
Quinlan v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 2, 2002PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered January 23, 2001, which, insofar as appealed from, as limited by the briefs denied plaintiffs motion to amend his bill of particulars so as to allege violations of Industrial Code (12 NYCRR) § 23-1.7 (a), § 23-2.1 (b) and § 23-3.3 (b) (1), (3); (c), (e), and granted defendant-respondent’s motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs cause of action under Labor Law § 241 (6), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The Industrial Code violations alleged in plaintiffs proposed amended bill of particulars do not support a cause of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zuniga v. Stam RealtyNew York Supreme Court · 1996
- Mendoza v. Marche Libre AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Zuniga v. Stam RealtyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Daly v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by11 opinions
- Buckley v. Columbia Grammar & PreparatoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Bald v. Westfield Academy & Central SchoolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Sparkes v. BergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Armental v. 401 Park Ave. S. Assoc., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Perillo v. Lehigh Construction Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.