Legal Opinion

United States v. Riggins

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 27, 2020No. Criminal No. 2020-0010Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal No. 20-10 (CKK) DAWUD RIGGINS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (April 27, 2020) Pending before the Court is Defendant Dawud Riggins’s Emergency Motion for Release Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, ECF No. 12 (“Def.’s Mot.”). In light of statutory factors and the COVID-19 pandemic, including Mr. Riggins’s asthma, he asks the Court to release him to home confinement under the High Intensity Supervision Program (“HISP”). The Government opposes his request. See Gov’t’s Opp’n to Def.’s Emergency Mot. for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Helling v. McKinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. City of Revere v. Massachusetts General HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API