Legal Opinion

Kritser v. Kuttruff

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1961No. Civ. 6613PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from judgments for defendant in an action for damages arising out of an automobile collision.

Facts

The pertinent facts shown by the record before us are substantially as follows: On April 17, 1958, at about 9:45 o ’clock a. m. on a clear, dry day, plaintiffs Robert Lee Kritser, his wife Mable Kritser and Helen Englehard, were travelling southerly on Highway 95 toward Blythe near Vidal Junction in a 1956 Ford station wagon belonging to plaintiff George M. Englehard. At the same time and place, Ruben Bonnell was driving defendant’s 1954 GMC panel delivery truck in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Huffman v. LindquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Taylor v. Savings Union Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Pobor v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Bealmear v. Southern Cal. Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. HuffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crooks v. PirroneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Rash v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Crooks v. PirroneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API