Legal Opinion

Highway Insurance v. Korman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 25, 1963No. Gen. 48,513PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice English

Plaintiff’s complaint and amended complaint were both stricken, and, after a hearing on defendant’s motion to strike a second amended complaint, the trial court again concluded that plaintiff had not stated a cause of action. An order was, therefore, entered striking the second amended complaint without leave to amend further, and the cause was dismissed. Plaintiff appeals.

Although part of plaintiff’s brief questions the sufficiency of defendant’s motion to strike, we shall consider the case, as did the trial court, on the question of whether or not the complaint itself states a cause of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Doner v. Phoenix Joint Stock Land Bank of Kansas CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Shlensky v. South Parkway Building Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Moroni v. Intrusion-Prepakt, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  4. Winger v. Chicago City Bank & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Farwell v. Pyle-National Electric Headlight Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sherman v. Field ClinicAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. Yale Development Co. v. Oak Park Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. Prueter v. BorkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. Shlensky v. WrigleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  5. Melish v. VogelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API