Gensemer v. Hallock
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Quillin, Judge.
Defendants/appellants, Macy and Clare Hallock, appeal from the judgment of the Medina County Court of Common Pleas finding that Macy Hallock breached his fiduciary duty to plaintiffs/appellees, and denying the counterclaim that plaintiffs/appellees breached such a duty to them. Plaintiffs/appellees, Richard and Paula Gensemer, cross-appeal from the judgment denying their claims for additional damages. We affirm.
In the early 1960s, appellants Hallock, appellees Gensemer, and another individual, Mel Gerspacher, jointly purchased several parcels of commercial real estate with the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Lorain National Bank v. Saratoga ApartmentsOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
- Crosby v. BeamOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Shover v. Cordis Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Adair v. WozniakOhio Supreme Court · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blair v. McDonaghOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- First Natl. Bank of Omaha v. iBeam Solutions, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Hanko v. NestorOhio Court of Appeals · 2019