State v. Moore
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from WinnesMelc District Court. —Hon. L. E. Fellows, Judge. The defendant was convicted of the crime of seducing one Sarah. J. French, an unmarried female of previously chaste character, and he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRothbock, J.
1. Seduction: indictment: limitation: evidence as to time. I. It was alleged in the indictment that the crime was committed on or about February 1 in the year 1886, and the minutes of the evidence of the witnesses before the grand jury show that the defendant and the complaining witness first had sexual intercourse in March, 1884, and that the same continued, with an interval of about one year, until some time in the spring of 1886. In February of that' year the complainant *496became pregnant, and was delivered oí a bastard child, which was born October 30, 1886. In the introduction of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- State v. CarronSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- State v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
- State v. WamboldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- State v. WhalenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Bynum v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
- State v. HeftSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- State v. SharpSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.