Legal Opinion

Linder v. Calero-Portocarrero

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 23, 1998No. Misc. Nos. 94-147 SSH, 94-150 SSHPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion for an expanded search, for denial of claims of privilege by the Department of Defense (“DoD”) and the Department of State (“DoS”) as to documents identified in any previous search, and for production of documents identified in any previous search by the DoD and the DoS; the DoD’s response; the DoS’s response; and plaintiffs’ replies. Upon consideration of the entire record, the Court denies plaintiffs’ motion in part and grants it in part as modified.

BACKGROUND

The movants in these cases are…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Tax Analysts v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  3. Heat & Control, Inc. v. Hester Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. In Re: Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  5. Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. City of Burlington, VermontCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Linder, David v. Calero-PortocarreroCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  2. Tucker v. American International Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
  3. Broussard v. LemonsDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1999
  4. Jackson v. AFSCME Local 196District Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
  5. New Products Corp. v. Dickinson Wright PLLC (In re Modern Plastics Corp.)District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API