Stitzle v. Evans
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Tarrant. Tried below before Hon. R. J. Boyken, Special Judge. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Gaines, Associate Justice.
On the 17th day of April, 1886, appellants conveyed to one Houghton the tract of land in controversy, for which the latter paid fifty dollars in cash and executed his promissory note, payable on the 1st day of March, 1887, for the sum of three hundred and fifty dollars. The note was described in the deed and a lien was expressly reserved to secure its payment. The note was not paid at-maturity. On the 27th day of March, 1887, Houghton and wife conveyed the land to appellee. Thereafter appellee tendered to appellant Philip Stitzle the amount of the principal and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dunlap's Adm'r v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1854
- Jones v. GoffTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Russell & Seisfeld v. KirkbrideTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Haney v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Burgess v. MillicanTexas Supreme Court · 1878
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Humphreys-Mexia Co. v. GammonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Mills v. MillsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Carey v. StarrTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- Thraves v. HooserTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- T-Vestco Litt-Vada v. Lu-Cal One Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.