Legal Opinion

Hewitt v. General Electric Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1896PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Third District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of McLean county; the Hon. Thomas F. Tipton, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craig

This was an action of replevin, brought by the General Electric Company on the 15th day of August, 1894, against William B. Hewitt and the Davies Coal Company, to recover the following property: One long wall under-cutter, for mining coal; twenty-four 16 C. P. incandescent lamps; two thousand feet of weather-proof wire; six hundred feet of lead-covered cable; one switch-board; one lot of station instruments; one dynamo of 20,000 Watt capacity. To the declaration Hewitt pleaded, first, non detinet; second, non cepit; third, property in the defendant; fourth and fifth, property of the Davies…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sword v. LowIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Long v. CockernIllinois Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fairbanks Steam Shovel Co. v. WillsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1914
  2. Hanson v. VoseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Snuffer v. SpanglerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Thuma v. Granada Hotel Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1933
  5. Ward v. EarlAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API