Legal Opinion

Dills v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided September 26, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Morris, Commissioner—

Reversing.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of setting np and operating a game of chance. Kentucky Statutes, Section 1960. The indictment charged that Dills, operated a poker game for compensation, “take out,” per■centage or commission. The jury fixed his punishment at a fine of $500 and confinement in the Reformatory for two years. In grounds for a new trial, among others, it was contended: The court should have sustained his motion for a directed verdict. As we read the evidence, we find that three police officers visited a restaurant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Benton v. KingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  2. Roaden v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Harper v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
  4. Chapman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  5. Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beets v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
  2. Davis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
  3. Bowling v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API