Bowling v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
MOREMEN, Justice.
Appellant, Hale Bowling, was convicted of the crime of setting up and operating a game of cards for compensation, an offense denounced by KRS 436.230. The punishment imposed was a fine of $500 and confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of one year.
Appellant urges reversal upon two grounds; (1) the instructions were erroneous ; and (2) the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict and the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a dirécted verdict of acquittal.
The pertinent portion of KRS 436.230 applicable here reads:
“(1) any person who, for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harper v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
- Palmer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Dills v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
3Cited by2 opinions
- Beets v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
- Davis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955