Legal Opinion

Bowling v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 6, 1953PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOREMEN, Justice.

Appellant, Hale Bowling, was convicted of the crime of setting up and operating a game of cards for compensation, an offense denounced by KRS 436.230. The punishment imposed was a fine of $500 and confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of one year.

Appellant urges reversal upon two grounds; (1) the instructions were erroneous ; and (2) the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict and the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a dirécted verdict of acquittal.

The pertinent portion of KRS 436.230 applicable here reads:

“(1) any person who, for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harper v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
  2. Palmer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Dills v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beets v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
  2. Davis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API