Legal Opinion

Oldenburg v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 7, 2009No. A08-0601PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

Appellant challenges the denial of her petition for postconviction relief, arguing that she should have been allowed to withdraw her guilty plea or have her sentence modified because a five-year conditional-release term was not part of the plea agreement. Because imposition of the conditional-release term did not violate the plea agreement and because appellant had notice of the conditional-release term when she pleaded guilty, we affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Paula Lynn Oldenburg pleaded guilty to first-degree DWI on July 25, 2003. Appellant entered into a plea agreement with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Alanis v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. State v. WukawitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. State v. Jumping EagleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robel Belay Kubrom v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  2. Thong v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  3. State of Minnesota v. Kyle Jon WilczekCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API