Legal Opinion

United States v. Ricardo Cornelius Beale

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 17, 1971No. 29150_1PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

2Per curiam

The petition of the United States for rehearing is granted. The *978court recedes from its opinion insofar as it held that the underlying rationale of Sabbath v. United States, 391 U.S. 585, 88 S.Ct. 1755, 20 L.Ed.2d 828 (1968) required that we hold that entry secured by deception and without use of force is governed by 18 U.S.C. § 3109.

Before Sabbath it was recognized that entry obtained by ruse or deception was not a violation of § 3109, because no “breaking” was involved. Smith v. United States, 357 F.2d 486, 488 n. 1 (5th Cir. 1966) (ruse, no force, entry stated to be…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Sabbath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. People v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Charles F. Leahy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  5. Louis D. Ponce v. Walter E. Craven, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. Charles B. Bradley, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  2. United States v. Jeffrey Clinton RainesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  3. State v. HaradaHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. DixonHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. ReganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API