Grayson v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Petitioner April Grayson appeals the denial of her petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
Sufficient evidence supports Gray-son’s conviction for bringing explosives into the jail, as we are bound by the California Court of Appeal’s conclusion that bullets are explosives. See Bradshaw v. Richey, 546 U.S. 74, 76, 126 S.Ct. 602, 163 L.Ed.2d 407 (2005).
Sufficient evidence supports Grayson’s conviction for procuring the victim for purposes of prostitution. Viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, Officer William’s testimony is sufficient to support the conviction. See…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bradshaw v. RicheySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. SheaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007