Multiple Intervenors v. Public Service Commission of the State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Levine, J.
In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner, an unincor*142porated association of large-scale electricity customers of, among others, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (hereinafter NiMo) and intervenor Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. (hereinafter O & R) challenged the validity of Opinion No. 89-29, rendered by respondent, Public Service Commission (hereinafter the PSC), which authorizes certain recoveries to NiMo and O & R in subsequent rate proceedings related to their respective demand side management (hereinafter DSM) programs. DSM programs are campaigns and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Boreali v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Rochester Pure Waters DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- New York State Council of Retail Merchants, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Abrams v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Keyspan Energy Services, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Matter of Energy Ass'n v. Public Service CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1996
- Owners Committee on Electric Rates, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Cable Television Ass'n of New York, Inc. v. New York State Commission on Cable TelevisionNew York Supreme Court · 1992
- National Energy Marketers Ass'n v. New York State Public Service CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.